From Predictive Analytics to Predictive Risk Identification in RBQM

Predictive risk identification supports RBQM oversight under ICH E6(R3). Learn how centralized risk monitoring improves traceability, prioritization, and inspection readiness.

From Predictive Analytics to Predictive Risk Identification in RBQM

Predictive risk identification supports RBQM oversight under ICH E6(R3). Learn how centralized risk monitoring improves traceability, prioritization, and inspection readiness.
Cyntegrity logo – Risk-Based Quality Management Solutions

Room For an Introduction

Semper dignissim vestibulum pharetra volutpat tincidunt et suscipit erat. Sed pharetra sapien nibh lectus magna vel enim cras accumsan. Diam aenean phasellus vitae nisl. Non tincidunt sit urna ut nunc. Tellus et amet adipiscing varius convallis. Aenean vitae vulputate lectus vel curabitur. Eget ac nibh id vitae sit tempus volutpat ultrices euismod. Proin pharetra egestas enim in volutpat vitae libero. Blandit proin morbi ut lectus consequat lobortis congue suscipit. Ac massa vitae vel in. Hac dolor nullam adipiscing vitae aenean mi.

Room For Pain Points, The Problem We're Trying to Solve, or Industry Trend

Semper dignissim vestibulum pharetra volutpat tincidunt et suscipit erat. Sed pharetra sapien nibh lectus magna vel enim cras accumsan. Diam aenean phasellus vitae nisl. Non tincidunt sit urna ut nunc. Tellus et amet adipiscing varius convallis. Aenean vitae vulputate lectus vel curabitur. Eget ac nibh id vitae sit tempus volutpat ultrices euismod. Proin pharetra egestas enim in volutpat vitae libero. Blandit proin morbi ut lectus consequat lobortis congue suscipit. Ac massa vitae vel in. Hac dolor nullam adipiscing vitae aenean mi.

Optional Steps/Flows/Points Sections

1
2
3
1

Step One Title

Sponsors must identify Critical-to-Quality (CtQ) factors early, including:

– Procedures essential to participant safety
– Data necessary to support primary endpoints
– Risks that could threaten scientific validity

These QbD elements then shape the monitoring strategy, not the other way around.

2

Step Two Title

Sponsors remain accountable for ensuring the study is designed, conducted, recorded, and reported in accordance with GCP — even when operational tasks are outsourced.

3

Step Three Title

Sponsors remain accountable for ensuring the study is designed, conducted, recorded, and reported in accordance with GCP — even when operational tasks are outsourced.

1
2
3
4
1

Step One Title

Sponsors remain accountable for ensuring the study is designed, conducted, recorded, and reported in accordance with GCP — even when operational tasks are outsourced.

2

Step Two Title

Sponsors remain accountable for ensuring the study is designed, conducted, recorded, and reported in accordance with GCP — even when operational tasks are outsourced.

3

Step Three Title

Sponsors remain accountable for ensuring the study is designed, conducted, recorded, and reported in accordance with GCP — even when operational tasks are outsourced.

4

Step Three Title

Sponsors remain accountable for ensuring the study is designed, conducted, recorded, and reported in accordance with GCP — even when operational tasks are outsourced.

1

Step One Title

Sponsors remain accountable for ensuring the study is designed, conducted, recorded, and reported in accordance with GCP — even when operational tasks are outsourced.

2

Step Two Title

Sponsors remain accountable for ensuring the study is designed, conducted, recorded, and reported in accordance with GCP — even when operational tasks are outsourced.

3

Step Three Title

Sponsors remain accountable for ensuring the study is designed, conducted, recorded, and reported in accordance with GCP — even when operational tasks are outsourced.

5

Step Five Title

Sponsors remain accountable for ensuring the study is designed, conducted, recorded, and reported in accordance with GCP — even when operational tasks are outsourced.

4

Step Four Title

Sponsors remain accountable for ensuring the study is designed, conducted, recorded, and reported in accordance with GCP — even when operational tasks are outsourced.

Optional Table

Semper dignissim vestibulum pharetra volutpat tincidunt et suscipit erat. Sed pharetra sapien nibh lectus magna vel enim cras accumsan. Semper dignissim vestibulum pharetra volutpat tincidunt et suscipit erat. Sed pharetra sapien nibh lectus magna vel enim cras accumsan.

Critical to Quality Factor

QTL Parameter

Definition

Why It Matters

Eligibility Criteria Compliance

% of randomized participants who do not meet inclusion/exclusion criteria

Proportion of subjects enrolled in violation of protocol-defined criteria

Non-compliant enrollment can compromise safety and endpoint validity.

Withdrawal & Retention

% of participants who withdraw consent post-randomization

Measures patient drop-out burden

High withdrawal rates impact endpoint interpretability and may indicate patient burden or tolerability issues.

Endpoint Completeness

% of subjects with missing or incomplete primary endpoint data

Tracks data completeness for the primary objective

Missing primary endpoint data weakens statistical power and interpretability.

AEs/SAEs of Special Interest

% of patients experiencing pre-identified AE/SAE categories

Signals emerging safety trends

Early detection of safety risks protects participants and may inform dose adjustments or stopping rules.

Eligibility Criteria Compliance

QTL Parameter

% of randomized participants who do not meet inclusion/exclusion criteria

Definition

Proportion of subjects enrolled in violation of protocol-defined criteria

Why It Matters

Non-compliant enrollment can compromise safety and endpoint validity.

Eligibility Criteria Compliance

QTL Parameter

% of randomized participants who do not meet inclusion/exclusion criteria

Definition

Proportion of subjects enrolled in violation of protocol-defined criteria

Why It Matters

Non-compliant enrollment can compromise safety and endpoint validity.

Eligibility Criteria Compliance

QTL Parameter

% of randomized participants who do not meet inclusion/exclusion criteria

Definition

Proportion of subjects enrolled in violation of protocol-defined criteria

Why It Matters

Non-compliant enrollment can compromise safety and endpoint validity.

Eligibility Criteria Compliance

QTL Parameter

% of randomized participants who do not meet inclusion/exclusion criteria

Definition

Proportion of subjects enrolled in violation of protocol-defined criteria

Why It Matters

Non-compliant enrollment can compromise safety and endpoint validity.

H3 Header Bold; Room For Solution

Semper dignissim vestibulum pharetra volutpat tincidunt et suscipit erat. Sed pharetra sapien nibh lectus magna vel enim cras accumsan. Diam aenean phasellus vitae nisl. Non tincidunt sit urna ut nunc. Tellus et amet adipiscing varius convallis. Aenean vitae vulputate lectus vel curabitur. Eget ac nibh id vitae sit tempus volutpat ultrices euismod. Proin pharetra egestas enim in volutpat vitae libero. Blandit proin morbi ut lectus consequat lobortis congue suscipit. Ac massa vitae vel in. Hac dolor nullam adipiscing vitae aenean mi.

Room For A Call-Out. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Orci facilisis curabitur lorem aliquam lobortis. Ut tincidunt nulla at est. Tempus in non iaculis eleifend est.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Orci facilisis curabitur lorem aliquam lobortis. Ut tincidunt nulla at est. Tempus in non iaculis eleifend est. Magna elementum nec amet phasellus. Non nisl tellus libero purus ornare aenean mattis. Ac sed magnis suspendisse morbi semper habitant pretium sit.

Room For a Final Thought or Bottom Line

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

 

Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Room For a Call To Action

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Stay Informed with Us

Risk-Based Quality Management in Medical Devices: ISO 14155 vs ICH E6(R3)

Medical device investigations are now assessed like RBQM trials. Learn how ISO 14155 and ICH E6(R3) align and download the practical translation guide....

From spreadsheets to Digital RACT | ICH E6(R3) compliance

Learn why spreadsheet-based RACT falls short of ICH E6(R3) and how Digital RACT in the MyRBQM Portal delivers traceable, inspection-ready risk governance....

Media Inquiries

Need a quote, speaker, or more info about Cyntegrity? Reach out directly to our media contact for timely assistance.

Discover Expert Interviews & Podcasts on Clinical Innovation

Explore short interviews and podcast episodes with industry experts discussing RBQM, Clinical Operations, Data Science, and the future of clinical trials.

New episodes added regularly