The FDA has published the finalized ICH E6(R3) Good Clinical Practice guidance. Unlike Europe’s July 23 deadline, the U.S. implementation date is still to be announced. This creates uncertainty for sponsors and CROs operating across regions, highlighting the importance of early preparation and alignment with global standards.
With the ICH E6(R3) guideline set for approval by October 2024, sponsors face new requirements in risk management, RBQM, and data integrity. Stay compliant and efficient by downloading our free infographic that highlights the key differences between ICH E6(R2) and E6(R3).
Explore the impact of ICH's Q9(R1), Quality Risk Management, guideline on RBQM and clinical trials in our latest blog post. Don't miss our free infographic that simplifies this complex guideline. Enhance your risk strategies today!
Exciting news on ICH GCP E6(R3) is here! Our CEO, Artem Andrianov, returned from the SCOPE Summit with updates on the updated guideline. ICH E6(R3) will incorporate technology advancements while prioritizing participant protection and reliable evidence. Don't miss Artem's thoughts on his experience at the summit. Stay tuned for more updates on ICH E6(R3)!
With the release of the final ICH E8(R1) version this month, sponsors and CROs are encouraged to embrace a Quality by Design culture. This final paper is part of a more general Good Clinical Practice (GCP) “Renovation” that involves the modernization of ICH E8 and subsequent renovation of ICH E6.
The final version of the ICH E8(R1) guidance discourages the old-school "one size fits all" approach. Instead, risk-based quality management concepts such as QbD and CtQ factors predominate these modern-day considerations which encourage the biopharma industry to go beyond the traditional checklists. We've visualized the final 2021 guidance, "General Considerations for Clinical Studies," for you.
The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated alternative distribution strategy adoption to facilitate “new normal” decentralized and hybrid trial concepts. Capturing the IMP supply chain risks associated with these more flexible distribution approaches requires synergy among people, processes, and technology. Former Senior Project Manager at GKM, Anke Mueller, shares with you how pandemic-induced supply chain risk data knitted together in a single RAC tool enabled her study team to pivot quickly and continue their studies in a timely fashion.
Building Critical to Quality Trees helps you to translate critical study needs and quality drivers into measurable outcomes and processes. Initially, this Lean Six Sigma approach serves as a business tool based on customer needs. Still, it is a helpful method of implementing Quality by Design in clinical research.
Do you find the prospect of Risk Analysis and Risk-Based Quality Management (RBQM) to be daunting? Then bear with us. We shall help you simplify and demystify the process by using an example to illustrate the key steps to consider.
Regulatory bodies are unanimous, today's clinical research needs Centralized Monitoring. We summarized Centralized Monitoring the infographic way, download your free copy here...
